Pages

Showing posts with label Paddy Johnson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paddy Johnson. Show all posts

12.09.2009

Fair and Fair Alike: Miami 2009. Art Bloggers @ Art Miami, December 5

.
Fair and Fair Alike coverage so far:
.
.
The blogosphere has flattened the hierarchy. As an artist you’re fairly powerless; in the blogosphere artists have the power not only to join the discussion but to lead it.
—Sharon Butler
.
From left: Hrag Vartanian, Sharon Butler, Thomas Hollingworth, Libby Rosof, Roberta Fallon, Paddy Johnson, Joanne Mattera. Photo: Elena De La Ville
..
.
I put most of most of my focus on the content. Professionals will find you if you are saying interesting things.
--Paddy Johnson

At the invitation of Art Miami, Art Bloggers @ convened a panel on Saturday, December 5, during fair week. While the rain fell in buckets outside, popping loudly at times on the enormous tarp that covered the roof, we stayed dry and audible in a specially constructed lecture room. Scheduled for 90 minutes the panel continued, with questions from the audience, for close to two hours.

Topic: Beyond Basic Blogging: Carving Our Niche in the Blogosphere
The premise of this panel, the third organized by Art Bloggers @, is that art bloggers have developed a greater sophistication in what we cover and how we cover it. We’re specializing—sharpening our focus, breaking stories, offering news and service features—and typically publishing more material, often faster, than conventional print publications. In an art world chronically short on coverage, we’re not just filling in the blanks, we’re breaking new ground.

Panelists:
Sharon Butler, Two Coats of Paint; Roberta Fallon and Libby Rosof, Fallon and Rosof Artblog; Thomas Hollingworth, Art Lurker; Paddy Johnson, Art Fag City; Hrag Vartanian, Hyperallergic; Joanne Mattera, Joanne Mattera Art Blog, moderator

What follows are highlights of the panel (and what I could read of my notes):


Q: Did you carve your niche over time, or did you create your blog because you saw a niche you could fill?
Fallon and Rosof started their Artblog in 2003 when there was, said Fallon, “a huge vacuum of art writing in Philadelphia.” Products of the city’s “huge DIY culture,” the two artists said, “let’s do it ourselves.”
Added Rosof, “We wanted to steer the discussion in Philly.” Their goal was to cover huge swaths of the art scene that were ignored by conventional print media: young artists, minorities, women. “We wanted to cover all the people who were underserved.”
Thomas Hollingworth originally conceived Art Lurker as as a personal portfolio. "It quicklyevolved to be a community forum when my efforts got the writing ball rolling in Miami,” he said.
Sharon Butler saw Two Coats of Paint as a tool for “building a community among painters” by posting reviews and links from a “curated selection” of articles from other publications.
Hrag Vartanian recently launched the “blogazine” Hyperallergic while continuing to post to his eponymous blog. He sees Hyperallergic, for which he has a business plan and accepts ads, as a platform for people to discuss what bothers them (tagline: Sensitive To Art and Its Discontents). The new venture offers another benefit, said Vartanian: “I’m sick of having to write for other people.”
Joanne Mattera: "When I started my blog in June 2006, I didn’t have a clue. But by that December, when I wrote about the art fairs in Miami, I knew what I wanted to do with the blog: report on the art I was seeing in New York and elsewhere. I’ve been doing that ever since.

Q: Have critics-turned-bloggers changed the quality of discourse in the blogosphere? Has their participation in the more democratic arena of cyberspace change the relationship between critic and reader, or critic and artist? Has the discourse of largely unsalaried bloggers changed how paid critics are approaching criticism—in terms of subject matter or length—in print or online? How are bloggers continuing to push the envelope online, thereby changing what and how everyone writes?

Not everyone responded to every part of this question. It’s also worth noting that just about everyone has written for print media. Here’s a sampling of what they said:

. Paddy Johnson: “[The accessibility] lets people bother you quicker.” She also acknowledged that the same accessibility gives her faster access as well.
. Fallon: “Having critics blog expands the discussion.” In terms of length and content, she noted that writing for print requires a more conventional journalistic approach (she is the critic for Philadelphia Weekly), while on a blog “you can write about what you want.“ She pointed out that when a publication operates in both mediums, “a truncated version often appears in print; the full version on line.”
. Rosof: Whether she’s writing for print or on line, Rosof focuses on what interests her, what she likes. “We don’t take much time writing about what’s bad.”

. Hollingsworth is writing for print and for his blog at the same time. “I was surprised at how much editing is done in print. For my blog it’s what I want to say, how I want to say it.” That said, his approach is “more of a magazine format,” and his mission in any medium is “to inspire writers to write, and galleries to up their game.”
. Butler: “The blogosphere has changed the whole landscape, flattened the hierarchy. As an artist you’re fairly powerless; in the blogosphere artists have the power not only to join the discussion but to lead it. And," she noted, “the tools of blogging are free and available to everyone.”
. Vartanian: “Critics bring their readership to the blogosphere.”
We all acknowledged New York magazine Jerry Saltz in this regard. While he’s not a blogger, his posts on Facebook generate a huge number of responses, so that a simple declaration on his FB page quickly expands into a conversation with multiple voices. (And a good deal of sucking up, as several panelist noted.)
.
Q: Bloggers have always understood that the dividends for our efforts are rarely paid in cash, but this year creative art bloggers have explored different ways to make blogging more profitable.
. Fallon
: “We’ve had ads for four years. They’re community kinds of ads [from local galleries, foundations and artists].” In the early format, said Fallon, the ads rotated so that each received the prime position at the top of the sidebar.
. Rosof: “When we switched from Blogger, we decided to fix the position and raise rates: more for ads that run at the top, less for the bottom. But if you add it all up, there’s not enough income to support the two of us, plus contributors and the techie crew. So, yes, we’re bringing in money, but it’s not enough. We’re thinking about going nonprofit.”
. Johnson: “I’ve been blogging since 2005. I’m a writer. One of the problems with running a blog is that it asks you to do things you’re not good at.” She’s referring, I think, to technical issues and recordkeeping. "Half the grant [she received the first Warhol/Creative Capital grant for blogging, in 2008] paid off debts that I’d accumulated. The rest has allowed me to live. I will run out by Christmastime. If you want to invest time in a blog, you have to find time to make it work. I can’t run the blog without the support of my readership. But," she said, “I hate asking for money.” She‘s also looking into strategies for advertising.
. Hollingworth: “I didn’t start my blog to make money. It’s a blog, not a job.”
. Vartanian: “I’m sick of culture being a grant charity case.” He’s promoting Hyperallergic with his husband, who is an interactive marketer. “I want to see what people respond to. We’re also going to be doing things like events.”
. Butler: “I'm exploring on-demand publishing to produce an edition of Two Coats of Paint artists' books that will be available for sale on the blog.” The first book she published was one of her own artist books, but she wants to branch out. “Generosity is the code among art bloggers.”
. Mattera: “I’m thinking along the same lines as Sharon. I’ve published books conventionally, but with my blog’s visibility, I think self publishing is the way to go now.”
.
Question from audience member Alexandra Greenawalt: “The biggest challenge for me is not the writing but the promotion. I find that print is not the most effective way to promote my blog. My grandparents are the ones who say, ‘I saw your work in the New York Times.'"
. Fallon
: “With a blog, we know what our readers are interested in. It changes what we talk about.”
. Butler: “Go to popular blogs and leave good comments that inspire other readers to click on your link. The blogroll is where you link to other blogs, and they to you. Posting regularly is key to developing a following.”
. Rosof: “Postcards. When we moved the blog [from Blogspot to another platform] we put the information on a postcard and left them in the real world: galleries, art cafes.”
. Fallon: “Do you have a Facebook page?”
. Johnson: “I put most of my focus on the content. Professionals will find you if you are saying interesting things.”
. Butler: Twitter is good for driving traffic to specific posts.
.
Question from audience member Jonathan Stevenson, author: “Will social networking overtake blogging?”
. Vartanian
: “There’s no way to achieve [what we do on the blogs] on social networking. Social networking, is more likely to replace phone calls than blogs."
. Butler: “Blogs and social networking are complementary.” But social networking, she notes, is more likely to replace postcards and other printed announcements than replace blogs.
.
Question from audience member Mary Birmingham, curator at the Hunterdon Art Museum, Clinton, New Jersey: “I’m a museum curator, and I find we’re getting more traction from bloggers than any other medium. What can we as institution do to work with you?”
Butler: Museums need to have good websites. List all the artists who are in each show, link to their sites, include press releases and images of their work. Flash animation isn't helpful, but access to good information is extremely important.”
Vartanian: “Museums could create a blog instead of sending email press releases.”
Hollingworth: “Museum shows are not that interesting to review. I’m more interested in the corrolary things they do: workshops, seminars.”
Mattera: "Have you considered an event that involves bloggers, perhaps as curators? By the way, museums need to abolish the no-photography ban."
Rosof: “You have to figure out what we’ll cover and send info about those shows. We’re unlikely to go out of our way.”
Franklin Einspruch, from the audience: “Have you ever sent a press packet to a blogger? Nothing has yet replaced that physical package.”
.
With that last Q&A exchange, the formal program ended. Individual audience members and panelists stayed on to chat. Then, speaking for myself, I went on to lunch and to spend the rest of the afternoon perusing Art Miami.

I’m sick of writing for free. I’m sick of culture being a grant charity case.
–Hrag Vartanian

It’s a blog, not a job.
–Thomas Hollingworth

We’re thinking of going nonprofit.
–Fallon and Rosof

Thanks to Art Miami; Dan Schwartz of Susan Grant Lewin Associates; and Pamela Cohen, Perminak Consulting, for the invitation to panelize and for setting up the facility so well. Thanks, too, to Elena De La Ville for taking photographs.

4.04.2008

ART BLOGGERS @ RED DOT

I'm late with this post. What can I tell you? Life, of the non-blogging variety, intervened. But I do want to put my two cents in about Art Bloggers @ Red Dot.






We were here:


The Red Dot Fair at the Park South Hotel, 128 E. 28th Street


And this was us:

That's you all in the audience. Panelists from left: Ed, Paddy, Carolina, Sharon, Carol and moi. Photo courtesy of Hrag Vartanian, whose blog post contains a link to a few Flickr images


Sharon Butler (in the blue shirt) and I (at far right) came up with the idea of bringing bloggers together in real time and space, typically at an art fair or event. Art Bloggers @ thus came into the world during the Miami art fairs, where a small group convened in the lobby of Flow Fair on Collins Avenue.

We had a bigger group in New York. Last Sunday, March 30, we met at the Red Dot Fair at the Park South Hotel. Some 40 or so bloggers showed up--some bleary-eyed, let it be said--as we started gathering in the lobby at 10:00 am. After an informal round table in one of the small conference rooms, we adjourned to the restaurant, which had been set up for a series of panels. Ours, "The Impact of Bloggers on the Art World," ran from 11:15 to 12:30 and could easily have gone on another hour.

I moderated a panel that consisted of Carol Diehl, painter, critic (Art in America), Artvent blog; C-Monster, aka Carolina Miranda, freelance writer; Edward Winkleman, gallerist, Edward Winkleman Blog; Paddy Johnson, freelance writer and blogger, Art Fag City; Sharon Butler, painter, writer (The Brooklyn Rail) and professor, Two Coats of Paint. I was the moderator. Sharon has posted some of the panel questions on our blog so that we might all continue the discussion online.

I started by offering some blog statistics, which I've updated for this post. According to Blogpulse, the total number of identified blogs is 77,104,143. In the last 24 hours alone, there were 95,529 new blogs. That's 3980 an hour, 66 a minute, and just over one new blog a second. Even if one half of one percent of those blogs is related to art, that's several hundred thousand blogs--offering potentially or actually far more commentary about art than conventional print media could ever produce.

So my first questions to the panel was:
What is our responsibility personally to good writing and journalistic integrity in our own blogs and within the blogosphere in general?

Ed got to answer first, as he would leave early to go to his gallery's booth at Pulse. I don't have notes, since I was focused on moderating, but I do recall this part of his response: "My readers are my editors." If there's one difference between print media and the blogosphere (aside from the lack of salary in the latter) it's the instantaneousness of the medium. You can't pull one over or get away with shoddy reporting when your readers can call you on it. And they do.

The conversation drifted to ethics. Since the panel was composed of ethical people, no one seemed overly concerned about what they were or weren't doing. Carolina, the most journalistically bona fide of the group (she used to work at Newsweek and was part of the team that helped expose inconsistencies in the resume of FEMA's Michael Brown) noted the importance of disclaimers when writing about a potential conflict of interest. (Disclaimer: I often disregard copyright to pull images from the Internet--but they're always in service to the related topic. )

We talked about stats--yes, we're all obsessed with them--and some technical stuff. There was some nice give and take with the audience, many of whom returned home almost immediately to blog about it. Art Bloggers @ has links. The thing that struck me was how nice everyone was. As you know, the blogosphere is often marked by contentiousness (and more). Here, everyone was very friendly.

James Kalm recorded it all. We'll let you know if he posts a video. (This just in, 4.8.08: he did. Click here for Part 1, and here for Part 2. Thanks, James. You distilled a lot of information in two 10-minute segments.)

We didn't get to the big questions-- Are we mainstream yet? Do we want to be? What is the future of art blogging?--but Sharon and I are planning something in New York in the fall, and of course in Miami in December, so the conversation will continue. We'll have the info on our respective blogs and on Art Bloggers @ in September.

Big props to George Billis, gallerist and founder of Red Dot Fair, for generously letting us convene. A partial list of attendees (thanks to Franklin for taking names) includes:

Chris Albert
Steven Alexander
Brent Burket
Franklin Einspruch
KosukeFujikata
Aneta Glinkowska

Stephanie Lee Jackson (aka Pretty Lady)

Chris Jagers
James Kalm
Olympia Lambert
Megan and Murray
Andrew Robinson
Harry and Jennifer Swartz-Turfle
Hrag Vartanian

Next post: A report on the ADAA panel at MoMA, "Is the Killer Art Market Killing Art." Then on to some fair reportage and pics.