tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post1905634822060843645..comments2024-03-03T15:01:00.402-05:00Comments on Joanne Mattera Art Blog: Here Comes the JudgeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-29646032539269248262009-07-17T20:09:16.954-04:002009-07-17T20:09:16.954-04:00interesting discussion! Im still on the fence and ...interesting discussion! Im still on the fence and more than likely am willing to give Sotomayer a thumbs up in the end. <br /><br />However I have to laugh out loud when anonymous people post little snarky remarks.. Go you!!Michelle Mariehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16957037836640905919noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-83373997172685787182009-07-17T00:22:13.366-04:002009-07-17T00:22:13.366-04:00Chris,
Or maybe "Venga la juez."Chris,<br /><br />Or maybe "Venga la juez."Joanne Matterahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02564594823192456546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-59824177788766901602009-07-17T00:08:17.203-04:002009-07-17T00:08:17.203-04:00Anonymous,
You're so proud of your little rem...Anonymous,<br /><br />You're so proud of your little remark that you can't even use your name.<br /><br />Because it's the Joanne Mattera Art Blog I can write whatever I want. There's always politics with the art, and they're always left of center, gay, feminist, pro multicultural, pro multilingual and pro civil rights for everyone. If you don't like it, you're welcomeJoanne Matterahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02564594823192456546noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-71174996612946690982009-07-16T14:16:34.011-04:002009-07-16T14:16:34.011-04:00Shouldn't the title of this post be, "Her...Shouldn't the title of this post be, "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigmeat_Markham" rel="nofollow">Here come da judge</a>?"Chrisnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-22894177236086199392009-07-16T07:13:32.407-04:002009-07-16T07:13:32.407-04:00I'm sorry, I thought this was "Joanne Mat...I'm sorry, I thought this was "Joanne Mattera Art Blog".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-20335998771958919792009-07-15T15:32:27.943-04:002009-07-15T15:32:27.943-04:00Ouch. It is certainly true that SCOTUS has been a ...Ouch. It is certainly true that SCOTUS has been a white man's game for far too long. As might be expected, this has been changing. And as the Founders rightly designed, change on the court occurs slowly. Return from the insane liberal excess of the 1940s and 1950s took about forty years. It will take time to work off the whiteness as well as some of the conservatism. We *want* this because itAdmiralhttp://arrd.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30832682.post-26311232548909273502009-07-14T23:08:12.860-04:002009-07-14T23:08:12.860-04:00Good post! I read the interview with Justice Ruth ...Good post! I read the interview with Justice Ruth Ginsburg in Sunday's Times and found it so disappointing to read that although she was able to benefit from affirmative action policies at Columbia in 1972, affirmative action on the Supreme Court has had such a limited affect after more than 30 years. I think I heard that out of 110 justices appointed to the court, 106 of them have been whiteNancy Natalehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03325421420384484035noreply@blogger.com