.
.Installation of Lynda Benglis's 40-year retrospective at the New Museum, February 9-June 9, 2011 (Image courtesy of The New Museum)
.
Earlier this year I went to the New Museum to see the Lynda Benglis retrospective. The work ranges from about 1970 to 2009, almost 40 years. While some of the poured latex pieces have settled into structural decline, they are an integral part of the artist's oeuvre and an essential milepost on her esthetic journey. I can't imagine a retrospective of her work without them.
.
I was thinking about this when I ran into my buddy Shane, who was also visiting the exhibition. Standing before one of those latex pieces—the Fallen Painting you see in the foreground of the image above—we chatted about the whereabouts of our own work. Shane confessed that he has no idea where his pre-MFA work is, aside from a few pieces that he gave to friends. I admitted that I have nothing from my art school years save for one small abstraction in encaustic that my father put up in his tool room behind the garage. (My mother returned it to me after he'd passed away, which is how I have it now.) I also retain virtually nothing from the first 10 years of my career—when, frankly, it was not so much a "career" as a hand-to-mouth-existence marked by the moving and hauling I did with my pickup truck while collecting food stamps. I moved around so much that I left much of my stuff for "safekeeping" with friends. Considering that they also moved around, that early work has surely passed through portals into other quadrants of the universe.
The only painting I have from art school: Untitled, 1970, encaustic on panel, 14 x 12
..
OK, so most of that early work wasn't worth keeping. But when I look at this little abstraction in encaustic, I see all the seeds of what I do now: reductive field, repetitive elements, saturated color, and some of the same combinations of hue. Even the medium, which I promptly relinquished after the Painting Materials class requirement, came back into my life and is now the one in which I work most frequently.
My conversation with Shane prompted me to ask myself:
Do I have a record of my work?
Yes I do. I don't necessarily know where the work itself is but I have slides, and now digital images, of everything from the first few years after art school. I used to take the work outdoors on an overcast day—
the cloud cover acting as the world's largest diffuser—and shoot it against a light-colored wall (or, if it was small, against a larger gessoed canvas).
Do I know where my recent work is?
Yes and no. I know what work each gallery has and what they have sold. But I don't have a complete record of whom the work was sold to. One gallery is scrupulous about including the name and address of the collector on the copy of the invoice she sends to me. Another has the information in her head and will share it; indeed, she often brings her artists and their collectors together for events in the gallery, but there's no written list. Others haven't provided the information and I, to my chagrin, haven't asked. It's not that I'm shy about inquiring; I'm just too freaking overworked to handle every administrative chore. And even if I had all the names of all those collectors, they more around, too, which means that the collector list would have to be updated regularly. (Yes, I need an assistant.)
How are the images archived?
I have slides of the early work. Every couple of years I move them into newer, more archival sleeves. The color has remained remarkably true. When I have a moment—ha!—or when I get that assistant, I will scan the slides so that I have the images in digital form as well. The more recent work work I've shot digitally is organized in e-folders by series, by year, and by gallery. Here redundant redundancy is my motto. Some of you are using digital inventory systems, and I'd like to hear what they are.
How is the work maintained?
I can't speak for the condition of the work that's in private collections, but I'm going to trust that the work in institutional and museum collections is being monitored and maintained. As for the work in my possession, it's stored securely in a room that I try to maintain at 50% humidity.
Really, a retrospective?
OK, for most of us, the big retrospective will likely remain a moot issue. If and when MoMA comes calling for any one of us, I suspect their administration will track down the work they want to include and their conservation department will take the necessary steps to prepare it for exhibition. But given that we have spent most of our lives making art—even though we are willing to relinquish it after it's completed—it's just stupid of us to lose track of where it is.
Are you ready for your retrospective? How do YOU keep track of your work?
This will be the last Marketing Mondays for the year. Insciala I'll be reporting from Miami and then back at my desk posting about the fair for the entire month of December. It's not too late to Send Me to Miami. Covering the fairs is costly, and I write for three solid weeks after I return, posting features almost every day. Your contributions will provide much needed support.