Pages

7.08.2007

The Artist as Curator: Luxe, Calme et Volupté


..Review by Debra Wolf, Atlanta Journal Constitution:
"Order and beauty form the organizing principle in an engaging new exhibition at Marcia Wood Gallery....Using Baudelaire and Matisse as a springboard for contemporary expression, Mattera's premise is both clever and effective. Fastidious process (order) is essential to aesthetic outcome (beauty). Mattera's selections are smart and pleasing in a show that combines control and creativity, visual and tactile harmony, and individual refrains of luxe, calme et volupte....Verdict: Intelligent and pleasurable."

.

I love everything about curating: conceiving a theme, making studio visits, selecting the work, challenging my left brain to write an essay about how everything fits together. And then working with the installer to make everything fit together. I'm not wild about the paperwork--and let me say right here that I have renewed appreciation for the administrative slalom a dealer needs to negotiate each month. But seeing an idea manifest on the walls of a gallery is thrilling.

This post is about my experience curating a show, Luxe, Calme et Volupté, for the Marcia Wood Gallery, Atlanta. The show is up June 7 through August 25th.



Installation view for the Front Gallery looking toward entry: Tim McFarlane, All That Could Be; Rainer Gross, Espinal Twins; Robert Sagerman, 11,257. On floor: Venske & Spanle, Smurf



Installation view of the North Gallery from entry. From left: Julie Gross painting, Two One Punch; Chris Ashley installation, Jukebox 1-28; Maureen Mullarkey collages. On floor: a Venske & Spanle Smurf

North gallery looking toward Marcia's office (with Frances Barth's red/gr over desk). From left: Julie Gross, Two One Punch and Scooter; Julie Karabenick, Composition 65 and Composition 64; Chris Ashley, Jukebox 1-28 with digital presentation of 365 HTML Drawings. On Floor: Venske & Spanle Smurf


Marcia Wood, my good friend and longtime dealer in Atlanta, gave me her blessing--and her gallery --to pursue my idea, which at its core is a meditation on visual pleasure. After a decade of pornified bimbettes, video loops of window washers and the recently repickled shark (it's a big, interesting art world out there), I was craving a taste of the sublime. So I started making a list. Of course my idea of beauty is different from yours, that's the beauty of it, but I did want to refer to formal ideas of harmony—order, pattern, shape, texture and color--put together in ways that evoke feelings of pleasure, maybe feelings of the spiritual as well.

The words of my friend Stephen Rosenberg, a principal of Rosenberg + Kaufman Fine Art in New York, buzzed in my head as I considered this artist or that work: "The problem with artists who curate is that they always put too much in." He wasn't telling me this specifically, but when I heard it, it stuck. So I pared. Then added. Pared then added. Marcia's gallery is big--there are three separate gallery spaces with a total of about 2,500 square feet--so my list didn't have to be sliced to the quick, but with Stephen's words resonating, I was mindful of not overstuffing the idea.

Front Gallery looking toward Terrace Gallery. From left: Robert Sagerman, 11,257; Frances Barth, Heat Glance; Tim McFarlane, All That Could Be. In distance: paintings by Timothy McDowell and Heather Hutchison


My preference is for abstraction. In curating this show, I followed my own response to the harmony of elements, and to the transcendent nature of light—its intensity, translucence, luminosity and iridescence. I selected paintings, along with collages and sculptures, from artists whose work makes me become conscious of my own breath, which is to say that I connect with it so physically that the act of seeing, feeling and breathing are one. It’s a cliché to say "time stops," so let me just report that there does seem to be a temporal slowing down as I stand before a work that engages me fully. Or maybe it’s simply that I have stopped long enough to let the chemistry of the experience wash through me, to let it change me ever so slightly from the person I was before I experienced the particular piece of beauty.

I ended up selecting 15 artists, 13 individual artists and an artmaking duo, and what emerged was Luxe, Calme et Volupté--luxury, tranquility and pleasure, after the refrain in Baudelaire's "L'Invitation au Voyage." For the most part these are artists with whom I have shown, or with whom there is a gallery affiliation, or simply artists who found their way onto my visual radar in one exhibition or another and whose work I’ve followed avidly since. In every instance their work resonates for me personally as well as with this theme.


The artists in the show are David Ambrose, Chris Ashley, Frances Barth, Julie Gross, Rainer Gross, Heather Hutchison, Julie Karabenick, Timothy McDowell, Tim McFarlane, Maureen Mullarkey, Rose Olson, Robert Sagerman, Donna Sharrett, and Venske & Spanle.



My essay for the exhibition can be found at the end of this post.




Terrace Gallery. From left: Rose Olson, Soft as Memory, Seven Reds, Orange Electric, Pulse, New Green, Balancing Earth and Water, and Diffusion Rising; Timothy McDowell, Nectar; Heather Hutchison, When This Dust Falls; Donna Sharrett, Ramble On, Your Song and Turn the Page

Terrace Gallery looking toward North Gallery. From left: Donna Sharrett; Heather Hutchison, Divided (warm); David Ambrose, Elevated Rose With Braided Chain and Southeastern Elevation; Rose Olson


Some acknowledgments: An artist cannot curate a good gallery show without the blessing, wisdom, support and expertise of the dealer. (Thanks, Marcia.) An online catalog doesn't materialize without the expertise, patience and fabulous design sense of the gallery associate (Thanks, Errol Crane). And the artwork doesn't happen without immensely talented artists willing to trust a curator's concept and let her take their work for two and a half months. Julie Karabenick sent her newest painting, even though she's preparing for a solo show of her own in September. Rainer Gross let me put dibs on a piece that he'd just finished. Robert Sagerman and Julie Gross made paintings especially for the show. I saw a maquette and a gouache sketch, respectively, so that trust goes both ways. And I'm thrilled with the paintings they made.


. . . . . . . .

Essay: Luxe, Calme et Volupté: A Meditation on Visual Pleasure

Earlier this year, after a day of studio visits and an evening of gallery openings in Chelsea, I took a short taxi ride up Eighth Avenue with Marcia Wood and the editor of a New York-based art magazine. The back-seat conversation was, of course, about art. Marcia mentioned that I was curating a summer show for her gallery, and because we were nearing our destination, I described it simply as “a meditation on visual pleasure.” 

“Ah, beauty,” responded the editor. “Isn’t it nice that we can talk about it again?” 

Choosing Beauty

Indeed, it’s hard not to gush. There’s a renewed desire in contemporary art for the elements that comprise formal ideas of beauty—harmony of order, pattern, shape, texture and color—put together in ways that evoke feelings of pleasure, maybe feelings of the spiritual as well. This may be an old-fashioned notion, but it’s back. Beauty is the new beauty.

The work in Luxe, Calme et Volupté is unabashedly beautiful. Appropriately for a show in this season, it is a summer idyll, a visual bonheur. Each of the 15 artists here—13 individual artists and an artmaking duo—have created works which, while formally rigorous, are sensually complex, richly simple or simply luscious. Consider the sumptuousness of David Ambrose’s textured paintings on paper, opulent on their surface and, deeper, in the wholeness of devotion they convey; the serene horizontals, rising and repeating, of Rose Olson’s luminous paintings, metaphorical oceans or skies distilled to their essence; or the polished marble sculptures of Venske & Spanle, cool and white, as innocently personable as they are slyly provocative.

Borrowing from Baudelaire

“Luxe, calme et volupté”—luxury, tranquility and pleasure—is the refrain in Charles Baudelaire’s 1857 poem,  "L'Invitation au Voyage."  In a celebration of life’s splendor, the poet invites his beloved to travel with him to an imagined place where the light is golden and the air perfumed, the language is soft and secret, a place of order and beauty where all desires are met, a world of luxury, tranquility and pleasure. It seemed the perfect title for this show.

I am not the first person to borrow from Baudelaire. Matisse’s 1904-05  Luxe, Calme et Volupté, in Fauvist colors and post-Pointillist brushstrokes, depicts a different idyll, an afternoon of bathing and sunning at the water’s edge in Saint-Tropez.  Monsieur Matisse’s paean to pleasure is intimate and seductive.


Matisse, Luxe, Calme et Volupt


Much to my surprise, Luxe, Calme et Volupté, the exhibition, has much in common with Luxe, Calme et Volupté, the painting. Both share a radiance of palette, a fullness of forms and a lushness of surface. Then, too, there is the repetition of elements that generates a larger whole. Matisse created his composition from the staccato swipe of a paint-laden brush, repeated again and again.  In this exhibition, the repetitions are in circles, in squares, in pins amassed and ordered, in paper pierced repeatedly, in pixels arranged, in paper layered and collaged and, yes, in the swipe of a paint-laden brush, repeated again and again.

Looking at Luxe, Calme et Volupté 
One of the pleasures of being an artist is engaging with art on a level that goes beyond mere looking. One of the pleasures of being a curator is bringing art into the fold of a theme that amplifies and supports the individual work, which in turn deepens and broadens the theme so that it expands beyond a curator’s vision.

Luxe

While all of the work in this exhibition resonates on all three notes of the theme, I have singled out artist and work in an area where the note sounds most fully.

David Ambrose invests the simplest of materials, watercolor and paper, with unexpected richness. Drawing from ornamental designs in stonework and lace, and from such sources as the resplendent rose windows found in cathedrals throughout Europe, Ambrose pierces his paper in a  filigree of pattern before putting paint to it. As in the large-scale Southeastern Elevation, the result is a densely worked surface, a harmonic brocade of color and texture with intertwined threads of historic, spiritual and personal reference.



David Ambrose, Southeastern Elevation, 2006, watercolor on perforated paper, 59 x 44 inches


Drawing from history, but on an intimate scale, Maureen Mullarkey creates collages from the pages of old books and diaries. Each layered composition, sometimes composed with legible words or almost decipherable phrases, is a small reservoir of cultural memory. “Gutenberg Elegies,” she calls them. We may not recognize the specific circumstances they represent, but we understand them. Without wanting to ascribe more than the artist intended, I would venture that the strong horizontals in Mullarkey’s work, such as On the Sound,  give them a topographic character as well. Never mind that many of these works are barely larger than the size of your hand, they suggest abundant fields or rolling hills to be traversed and explored with the mind, much as the original volumes might have.

The large, often monumental paintings of Rainer Gross typically come two by two.  Gross is the creator of a unique process in which two separate surfaces—one layered with dried pigment, the other with icing-thick oil paint—are pressed together and, after a time, pulled apart. The paintings that result, such as Hutton Twins (the artist pulls the names at random from the Manhattan phone book), are more-or-less mirror twins, both original, for neither could exist without the other. While the process is intriguing, it is the fulsome color—heavily pigmented, saturated, with velvety flakes that bring the surface almost into relief—that intoxicates.

Rainer Gross, Hutton Twins, 2006, oil and acrylic on canvas, 24 x 20 inches each


Tim McFarlane’s luxe is in his layers. Each of his paintings is a dense net of lattices that fall loosely over one another. In All That Could Be, a large rectangle of luscious tangles that could heat a room by hue alone, the eye works hard to peer around and through the layers. Speaking formally about his work, McFarlane says he’s exploring “aspects of aggregation and negation through color, line, mark-making and brushwork.” Speaking informally, I would say that the endless pleasure I have experienced in this work comes from allowing myself to become, and to remain, visually enmeshed.

Tim McFarlane, All That Could Be, 2006, oil on canvas, 60 x 84 inches


Calme
“Order and beauty” is the other half of Baudelaire’s refrain. And in the work of Chris Ashley, Frances Barth, Heather Hutchison, Rose Olson and Donna Sharratt those elements prevail.

In truth, Donna Sharratt ‘s work is as luxe as it is calme, each object a mandala of pearls and flower petals and other delicate objects set into a wax-covered wooden box.  But the overriding element in her work is order. “Mirroring the Buddhist mandala form, the circular shape enveloped by the square …characterizes the infinite within the finite,” says the artist. “The geometric schemes of Gothic cathedral windows and the numeric configurations of prayer beads inform the mathematical arrangements of the work.” Your Song, a memorial piece to her musician brother who died too soon,  exemplifies Sharrett’s engagement with repetition, ritual and remembrance.


Donna Sharrett, Your Song, 2003-05, mixed media with pearls, pressed flower petals, thread, 18 x 18 x 1.25 inches 


Julie Karabenick‘s paintings mine the infinte richness of a single rectilinear form.  There is nothing meditative about the work—indeed, Karabenick consciously subverts the symmetry of her geometric endeavor—but each composition holds itself in easy equipoise. With its limited palette and uninflected color, Karabenick’s Composition 64 strikes me as a centered conversation, one that is spirited, inquisitive, but always returns to the main topic. Because her painting is process intensive and precise—“resolutely geometric” the artist describes it—the work goes slowly, but each successive painting in the series, with its new combination of asymmetry and complexity, expands the expression of Karabenick’s resoluteness.

Julie Karabenick, Composition 64, 2006, acrylic on panel, 30 x 30 inches 


The horizontal is a predominant element in Frances Barth’s paintings, which might be described as abstract landscapes with narrative timeline, a theme she began investigating early in her career and which she has continued to pursue. In this exhibition we show two works painted roughly a decade apart. The 1995 Red-Gr, simultaneously flat and deeply spatial, is vast enough to visually fall into—all the better to contemplate its contradictory dimensionality. In Barth’s newest work, such as the boldly horizontal Heat Glance, which she describes as “both object and panorama, “ you contemplate its light and space as if peering through a slot. It’s a tantalizing slice of imagined landscape and—this is a good thing—it leaves you wanting more.

Frances Barth, Heat Glance, 2006, acrylic on canvas, 10 x 96 inches


Minus the e, the French word for luxury becomes the Latin lux, which means both luxury and light. Linguistically I’m stretching, but conceptually you can see where I’m going when I say that the work of the next three artists is all about illumination.  Heather Hutchison has been working with translucence for two decades. She is one of the few artists who paints with beeswax on plexiglass. Working with a shadow box that holds a top surface and the space within,  Hutchison is free to explore translucent on transparent and the ways light passes through the surface or is reflected from it. You see this clearly in Divided Warm, where gradations of translucence converse intimately with one another. The artist refers to her work as “post-Minimal,” which I take to mean that it embodies what Minimal is, a reductive presence, as well as what it is not, a surface that revels in its materiality.

Heather Hutchison, Divided (warm), 2006, acrylic on plexiglass with wood frame


For Rose Olson refractive pigments painted stripe on stripe, layer upon layer, create veils of iridescent color that change as the light hits them this way and that. Walk one way, you see one color; move slightly, and you see another. Olson calls this mutability “a quiet dialog of shifting color, shifting space.” Her substrate and ground are one and the same, maple plywood, which is visible, sometimes faintly, sometimes more so. In Diffusion Rising, as in the rest of her elegant oeuvre, Olson’s color shimmers over the surface as light as a breeze. Hexagram 20 of the I Ching is as good a description as any of her work: “Kuan/Contemplation. The wind above, the earth below."














Rose Olson, Diffusion Rising, 2006, acrylic on birch, 24 x 15 x 4 inches; with angle view




Chris Ashley’s HTML drawings are nothing without light, for they exist in their primary incarnation as ordered pixels on a screen. Ashley’s daily practice is to create a drawing a day on his blog using nothing but computer code, which then appears on the screen as a luminous geometric composition. This is Etch-a-Sketch for the 21st Century, though Ashley is clearly thinking outside the box: “I want to make images that encourage associations to nature, the body, place, thought, sound, language, social relations and history.” For this exhibition, Ashley has printed out a month’s worth of drawings—February 2007’s, called Jukebox 1-28—and arranged them in calendar format, while a year’s worth of HTML drawings flashes on a nearby screen.

Chris Ashley, Jukebox (detail 9 of 28), unique digital prints, 11 x 8.5 inches


Volupte
Volupte translates as pleasure, which includes sensory as well as sensual arousal: smell, touch and libido.

Timothy McDowell’s world is a fantasy of nature: part still life and part garden, with succulent fruit and bursting blossoms afloat in an inviting if undefined landscape. From its earth-toned palette to its languorous imagery, everything about McDowell’s painting appeals to the senses. Witness the golden Nectar, its images fairly dripping with ripeness. The scent of honey that hovers is not in your imagination. McDowell suspends his earth pigments in sweet-smelling beeswax, which is applied when it is molten. In selecting his medium and materials, the artist has wittingly or not created an olfactory idyll in the studio. “I have grown dependent on the faint smell of honey, earth and wood while I work,” he says.


Timothy McDowell, Nectar, 2006, oil and wax on panel


A master at color and composition, Julie Gross pushes contrary elements into a tense dynamic of throb and pulse.  Are her circles actually moving or does it just seem so? Consider Two One Punch. While Gross’s color is flat, the zaftig forms—all squeezy and flowing— seem to want to erupt out of two dimensions and into a third. And each, it seems, wants to get there first. Gross describes the movement as “a kind of dance.”  Yes, a bump and grind. These are not just circles. They are juicy orbs whose formal harmony is ripe with a suggestion of sensory pleasure. 

Julie Gross, Two One Punch, 2003, oil on canvas, 32 x 32 inches


If Gross’s forms seem poised to burst into three dimensions,  Julia Venske and Gregor Spanle’s carved marble sculptures have actually done so. With their oozy undulations, each Gumphot or Smurf appears to continue to metamorphose before you. Consciously playful, each with a distinct “personality,”  Venske & Spanle’s work is nevertheless sensuous—each piece a smooth, cool body that you can’t help but stroke and touch.


Venske & Spanle, Smurf 38, 2003, marble, 10 x 18 x 18 inches


Robert Sagerman’s nearly sculptural abstractions balance stringency and sensuousness in equal measure. To the viewer’s eye they tip firmly to the side of unbridled sensuousness: abstract fields of lavishly applied paint that radiate, whether from the intensity of the color, such as 11,257, or from the visual vibration of hues in proximity and relation to one another. Sagerman, who is pursuing a doctorate in medieval Jewish meditational practices, has a different agenda, however. "My work activity in its purest form centers ultimately…around the counting of each stroke for each color that comprises each painting," he says. "For me, the numbers themselves are the most direct expression of my work." Thus the balance tips again; for the artist, who is repeating and tracking his strokes, the painting is a meditation.


Sagerman’s exquisite duality reminds us that visual pleasure can resonate on many levels, whether physical, mental or spiritual—or all at once. We need only to open the door to the experience. I hope you will find that Luxe, Calme et Volupte offers you such a portal.

7.03.2007

Living Color

For "The Artist As Curator: Luxe, Calme et Volupte," click here

You’d like to think you’ve reached a certain position in your field when a paint company names a color after you. Joanne Loves This Red! is an intense, semi-transparent orange red from Evans Encaustics, and the name reflects my predilection for the hue.

I’m flattered. Thrilled, actually. And I love being able to say that the color I have used in a painting is in fact named for me. But namesakes aren't always as flattering. Years ago, after art school, I moved to Upstate New York to live the country life. Needing a vehicle, I bought a 10-year-old red VW bus from my neighbors, Jenny and Milford Pitts, who raised their own vegetables and farm animals. My engine, which was just slightly more powerful than a lawnmower, needed constant work so I often visited their compound for Milford’s knowhow and the use of his tools (until I got my own). We got to be friends.

One spring they bought a bunch of holsteins. I think you can see where this is going: They named one of the cows after me. "Joanne" was not the best milker, and she liked to wander off. It was mortifying to have someone call your name, and to respond, only to realize that the call was for the cow.

I much prefer the new "me."

7.01.2007

Hatshepsut, Transvestite Queen

For "The Artist as Curator: Luxe, Calme et Volupte," click here

The Internet headlines were worthy of the New York Post: "Remains of beard-wearing Egyptian queen ID'd" and "Ruler was known for dressing like a man and wearing a false beard."

Queen Hatshepsut and her pharaonic beard

The story was straight out of, well, Dynasty.

The mummy of Queen Hatshepsut, who ruled Egypt in the 15th Century B.C., has been identified. The mummy, found in a nondescript tomb, had been discovered a century ago and left on site. Recently an observer noted that the position of repose, with the left hand over the chest and the right hand by the side, was that of a ruler. Another observer noted the presence of a molar in the box of entrails that had been left

Cairo CSI: Hatshepsut was identified by her dental records--actually, by a loose molar that fit perfectly into an empty socket in her skull

with the body, so the bones, the tooth and the entrails were brought to the Cairo Museum for genetic testing. Helpful, that molar, because it allowed genetic resarchers to test for mitochondrial DNA since they had previously identified other of Hatshepsut's female relatives. Voila, the long-missing Queen.

“We are 100 percent certain the mummy belongs to Hatshepsut," Egypt’s antiquities chief, Zahi Hawass, told The Associated Press.


Long story short: It seems Hatshepsut took the throne from from her young stepson, Thutmose III. She wore the beard and men's clothing to distinguish herself as a pharaoh (because apparently even female pharaohs had to take on the trappings of a male to have

A figure of Hatshepsut from her temple in Luxor, on the west bank of the Nile

power). When she died in 1453 B.C. after a successful and productive 21 year rule, Thumose III, the bitter little snot, had her remains removed from the royal tomb and eradicated as many traces of her reign as he could. Clearly the temples and statues remained, but until this past week, the body did not.

So history will be rewritten to something like, "Hatshepsut's mummy was identified by DNA testing 3500 years after her death." Her legacy remains the same, however: She was known as a builder of Ancient Egypt.

For more on the discovery: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19454551/

6.13.2007

First National Conference of Encaustic Painting

I’m not the best person to attempt a report of the First National Conference of Encaustic Painting , which took place June 8-10, at Montserrat College of Art in Beverly, Mass. As the conference founder I’m unashamedly skewed in its favor, but I’ll give it a try. As with my BaselMiami reports, I'm offering you a biased, myopic and journalistically suspect look at the events--with pictures.
Here’s a day-by-day overview:
.

Thursday This part is not connected to the conference proper, but it involved conferees. I invited about 30 artists who had taken a Master Class or consult with me to come to my Salem loft (about three miles from the college) for wine and cheese. About 25 folks showed up. Although I knew everyone, initially many folks didn’t know one another. This was not true by the time we left en masse for dinner two hours later, when 25 friends walk together to the Thai restaurant downtown. Fun! It was worth having spend two days cleaning up for the party. Later a few diehards returned chez moi for a last glass of wine.
The pre-conference party at my loft. Photo courtesy of Eileen Goldenberg


FridayRegistration was scheduled for 3:00 pm, so many of the conferees who arrived on Boston's North Shore early found their way to the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, where a Joseph Cornell exhibition, organized by PEM curator Lynda Roscoe Hartigan, was featured. I went for a bike ride as I knew it would be the last exercise I’d have for the next several days.


Registration: Around 3:00 p.m. conferees started streaming into Montserrat’s Hardie Building. Everyone got a folder with maps, color-coded schedules and presenter bios. And a pair of red wax lips.
The Hardie Building, center for many of the conference activities
,
Art Supplies: Vendors were set up in the Hardie building, just upstairs from the registration desk. Enkaustikos, Evans Encaustics and R&F Paints were there with luscious displays of paint; Paula Roland demonstrated her hot boxes (guess who purchased both of them?!) and Rodney Thompson had panels stacked high. (I eyed the 16x16-inch panels, thinking I’d return later to purchase four. Alas, I waited too long. By Saturday Rodney had sold out of everything.)
.


Above: Piper Evans and Hylla Evans of Evans Encaustics, Sonoma, California. All photos by Carol Zepp courtesy of Montserrat College of Art except where noted

Above: Gina Adams at the R&F table with conferees Lynn Bregman Blass and George Mason


Right: Paula Roland demonstrating her hot box for monoprinting



Above: Gina with a spectrum of R&F hues

Above: Rodney Thompson with his perfect panels




Left: More luscious hues, this time from Evans Encaustics


Below: Anne Cavanaugh pondering the palette of Enkaustikos paints at The Fine Art Store's booth


"Hot Stuff": At 4:00, the doors to Montserrat’s 301 Gallery were unlocked for the opening of "Hot Stuff," juried by Zola Solamente, director of Boston’s Arden Gallery. The entry process had been open to participants of the conference. Thirty-two artists and 48 works were selected. The show, open to the public, was impressive for the range and quality of the work—limited to 30 inches to allow for a greater number of selections—and the installation was superb.
.
Zola at right with Dean of Faculty and me standing alongside Debra Ramsay's reductive abstractions
.
Montserrat's outgoing president, Stan Trecker, was impressed with both the esthetic level of the work and the passion of its makers, most of whom were in attendance. Laura Tonelli, Dean of Faculty, noted the work of Debra Ramsay, elegantly reductive colorfields in pale aqua and ivory that incorporate a cracked eggshell intarsia as a textural element.
.
Norman La Liberte, a painter and friend of Montserrat, purchased a painting by Linda Womack.
I wasn’t buying, but I liked a lot, including:
. Elena De La Ville’s sepia-toned photographs of torsos
. Alexandre Masino’s quiet still lifes in tones of ocher and warm gray
. Linda Cordner’s brilliantly hued geometries
. Kim Bernard’s organic sculptures in clay and wax
. Miles Conrad’s and Ed Angell’s dimensional paintings, each about 12 inches square, with elements emerging from the wax surface (Ed: you need a website!)
. Diana Gonzalez Gandolfi’s small paintings with almost pictographic symbols suggesting familiar but ultimately mysterious narratives.
.

Above and below: Installation views of "Hot Stuff" at Montserrat's 301 Gallery





Jen Nazzaro installing the show. That's Jeff Schaller's painting over her left shoulder. Works by Kristin Swenson-Lintault, Diana Gonzalez Gandolfi and Debra Ramsay await installation


Two quiet corners. Above: sculpture by Lorrie Fredette and Kim Bernard, and a painting by Julie Shaw Lutts. Below: Still lifes by Alexandre Masino, with anothe view of Jeff Schaller's painting

My Keynote: Hey, the founder gets to give the talk—at least this year. My topic, "Almost Mainstream After 2000 Years," focused on encaustic history—ancient history, current history, and the space in between. Before the lights dimmed for slides, I talked a bit about having visited Jasper John’s studio in 1986, back when encaustic was, as he put it, "an archaic medium." I showed images from ancient history, jumped to John’s paintings from the Fifties, jumped again to the Seventies and Eighties with paintings by Kay WalkingStick, Rachel Friedberg and Michelle Stuart, and then showed work from the past few years. The medium is what links us, but it is our individual vision that sustains the work, wax or no wax.

That's me giving the keynote, "Almost Mainstream After 2000 Years." My theme was ancient history, contemporary history and the history in between. The image above is of a krater, circa 350 B.C., at the Met which shows a painter applying encaustic to a marble statue of Herakles. Did you know that most Greek marbles were polychromed? The image below is a work from 1955 by--oh, come on, you know who.

Saturday
Things started moving faster on Saturday morning, fueled by enthusiasm and caffeine.

"Encaustic: State of the Art" This was the only event scheduled for its time slot--Saturday morning--so we had a full house. The panel addressed issues in contemporary encaustic, from content versus medium, to how work in this medium is packed and shipped.

 Panel for "Encaustic: State of the Art": Painter Timothy McDowell, curator and museum director Katherine French, paintmaker Richard Frumess, gallery owner Hope Turner, critic and independent curator Barbara O'Brien. I'm the moderator at left

Barbara O'Brien, critic and curator, broke the ice when she said that until she was asked to be on the panel, she hadn't really thought much about encaustic. She'd had some inchoate ideas about it being somehow secondary in the hierarchy of painting, so she was surprised to see the quality and variety of good work being done in the medium. In that regard, she said, "I guess it's like racism. I was being racist about encaustic."

Katherine French does know about encaustic--she's shown work in the medium at the Danforth Museum where she is director. Her dialog with O'Brien about content and concept, rather than medium, was a jolt for some artists who are focused on the waxness of their work, but for others it was a welcome discussion. "I was so relieved that we could put the topic of 'art first, wax second' on the table and discuss it," Deb Ramsay, a painter from New York City, told me later.

As a Newbury Street gallerist, Hope Turner, owner of Arden Gallery, shows encaustic painting regularly (disclaimer: I'm represented by Arden) and deals with both conceptual and physical content. This is true, too, for Timothy McDowell who shows his paintings regularly in galleries around the U.S. and Canada. Both offered advice that acknowledged the commercial aspect of gallery representation--including the importance of archival preparation of the work.

(By the way, when Tim brought up the topic of beauty I had all I could do to keep from plugging the show I curated, "Luxe, Calme et Volupte': A Meditation on Visual Pleasure," which is at the Marcia Wood Gallery in Atlanta through August 25. As the moderator, I was a model of restraint, but here there's nothing holding me back from a little plug here: It's up through August 25. Tim is in the show.)

Richard Frumess, a painter and paintmaker, reminded us that commercially made encaustic paint has been widely available for only a couple of decades. Frumess's company, R&F Paints, has been a major factor in the expansion of encaustic. Frumess himself is looking forward to letting his company take over more of the reins so that he can get back to his own painting. Referring to the content versus medium discussion we'd been having all morning, he said to the audience, "I hope you'll understand, when I do go pack to painting, if I end up working in something other than encaustic."

There was also plenty of nuts-and-bolts advice for artists on how to present themselves and their work. Katherine French offered a cautionary tale--and provided a good laugh--as she recalled the artist who had called her to set up an appointment to view work and schedule a show (!) The artist explained that she was busy, so she wanted to schedule both a studio visit and an exhibition right away. Taken somewhat aback but responding to the chutzpah, French asked the artist what she liked about the museum. "Oh, I'm too busy to visit the museum," the artist responded. Deadpanned French: "She didn't get a show."

French did offer this sound advice, which I'm paraphrasing, and which is applicable when dealing with curators and dealers anywhere: "Come to the openings. Introduce yourself. Let me see that you know the museum. Let me get to the point where I recognize you. We're booked for the next two years, and I have a stack of 400 packages that have come in since the beginning of the year, which I've been too busy to open. But if you've broken the ice and ask me to look at your work, I'll be more inclined to do so."

After the panel, choices got more complex. When I planned the schedule, I was thinking of the CAA model--multiple choices in the same time slot. So the afternoon offered two options: A technical panel or a series of three demonstrations.


The Technical Panel:  "Wax, Paints, Substrates and Grounds"
This panel brought together experts in material matters: John Dilsizian, president of Dilco Refining (now part of Strahl & Pitsch), the man I fondly refer to as "Dr. Wax";  Hylla Evans, painter and paintmaker, founder of Evans Encaustics;  Rodney Thompson, painter and panelmaker; and Ed Angell, multimedia font of wisdom who operated the largest privately owned prop house in Hollywood before retiring to make his own art.


Panel for "Wax, Paints, Substrates and Grounds" on Saturday afternoon: Moderator Eileen Goldenberg, with panelists Ed Angell, Hylla Evans, John Dilsizian and Rodney Thompson

Forty artists took note--and took notes--as panelists discussed topics like temperature, ventilation, archival issues, and the best ways to mix materials (yes, some artists make their own paint, and who better to offer information than the foks who make it?). There was disagreement (disagreement is good!) about the safety of wax at melting temperatures and the best ways to deal with safety issues. John Dilsizian summed up the tone of the proceedings when he said, "I've found that the general rule with artists is that they don't like general rules."


Later in the afternoon a series of informal talks took place at the 301 Gallery. Alexandre Masino, Diana Gonzalez Gandolfi and Anne Cavanaugh talked about their work in the "Hot Stuff" show.






Right: Diana Gonzalez Gandolfi; below: Alexandre Masino. Masino photo by Sara Ashodian










Sunday
Here’s where it gets hot and heavy: three successive time slots, each with three simultaneous events. The CAA model of multiple offerings means there are many good choices. The good news: you’re sure to find something that interests you. The bad news: everything interests you and you have to choose. Here, you have a glimpse of each event..



 Above: Collaborati collaborating
 Below: Abby Heim who presented "Wax in the Context of the Hive," with fellow beekeeper Stephanie Williams. (Yes, those are real bees in a real hive in the classroom)

. . . . . . . .

Above: Paula Roland demonstrating "Encaustic Monotypes." Below: James Meyer, longtime assistant to Jasper Johns, discussing his own journey to encaustic, with participant Kandy Lozano looking on
.
. . . . . . . .

Above: Reni Gower at her talk on curating. She discussed the show she recently curated, "Divas and Iron Chefs of Encaustic Painting," and offered advice to artists who aspire to curating. Below: George Mason, who demonstrated the use of stencils on a heated palette
.
. . . . . . . .

Above: Mart Hart demonstrating the use of text elements in encaustic painting. Missing from this photo roundup: Kim Bernard, who gave a slide talk on encaustic sculpture, and Chris McCauley, who discussed realism in encaustic painting


Wrapup
Sandi Miot, a vice president of International Encaustic Artists, and Kim Bernard, president and founder of New England Wax, took the stage to announce a collaborative project between their respective groups. (Post script: the show, The Diptych Project, would be shown the following year at The COnference.) 

More info
. Deanna Wood’s blog,
www.artistemerging.blogspot.com
. Linda Womack's blog:
www.embracingencaustic.wordpress.com/tag/encaustic  



Sandi Miot, VP of IEA, and Kim Bernard, president of N.E.W., announcing a joing project, hatched at the Conference

Paula Roland showed slides of work that she didn't have time to show in her workshop, and Sara Ashodian gave us a glimpse of several workshops she attended. For those of us who didn't attend those particular events, it was great to see what went on, and for those who did, the images offered a different perspective of the goings on.